Archive for the ‘Health’ Category

Canadian Government To Implement Medical Tyranny

June 27, 2009

Femacamper (Guest Writer)
PrisonPlanet.com
Friday, June 26, 2009

I thought we had seen it all when the World Health Organization declared Swine Flu a level 6 pandemic. Apparently it’s just the beginning. In spite of the mounting resistance against forced vaccination, the Canadians have planned to trump that and just start rolling out the vaccines.

The Canadian Press reports “Canada’s chief public health officer says the decision of whether to vaccinate Canadians against swine flu has been all but decided.” They expect to start first trials with Canada’s younger and native populations first.

The whole swine flu pandemic reeks of mishandling, and conspiracy to profiteer over fear-mongering. Ron Paul mentioned how government would use it as an excuse to set up more regulations and spend more money. It could even be used to get the go-ahead for martial law. As has been demonstrated by scientific authorities, army intelligence, political scientists and investigate journalists, the swine flu is a military lab-engineered concoction designed to solidify the framework for what we are now seeing– medical tyranny.

Every free human being is sovereign, and should have the universal right to control over what goes into their bodies and bloodstream. Vaccines have been shown to be deleterious to the health of the individual taking them, and have little or no benefit in preventing oneself from getting the illness they are designed to stave off. In fact, as seen in cases in Nigeria and China it’s quite possible to actually contract the infection from the vaccine itself. Every flu season, numerous outbreaks occur, and each mutation and variation is not effected by the old vaccine. Added to that fact is the reality that mercury, biological contaminants and other pollutants are routinely used as ingredients in vaccines (this grim subject has even been parodied in the Canadian media):

 
 

Yet now the Canadian government has determined what’s best for its citizens without consulting them. Ignoring tried and true methods, they’ve embraced the medical industrial complex – big pharma – in a nefarious alliance. Canada is a prime example of a nanny state gone bad. Canadian health care is a socialist system with welfare bums and countless recipients on social assistance for some real, and some very imagined medical problems conjured up by a system that bolsters up hypochondria.

What will be next? If I, a Canadian citizen, refuse my injection, what will they do? Will they force me to take it at gunpoint? Will I be denied my basic human rights? Or perhaps I will be added to a terrorist database for not complying?

I notice the media is already putting spin on this news release the moment it was released. For example, read the editorial comment at the bottom of this article:

“This does NOT, I repeat, this does NOT necessarily mean that vaccinations will be mandatory or forced. Although they might trick you into believing so, but you can always print out the ten points of the Nuremberg Code and make them sign a document in which you state that you do not want to be vaccinated, and if they do vaccinate you, they will be personally liable for any and all consequences; this is, in case you don’t want any vaccines. But if you do want a few jabs, go right ahead.”

So, how does the Canadian government intend to immunize the “entire population” of Canada on a voluntary basis? Certainly, a large percentage of citizens would say no. But in the event of a real (or as in this case, conjured up) pandemic, there would have to be forced vaccinations to implement total immunization. This does not leave the Public Health of Canada in a good light.

This decision by the Canadian federal authorities is outrageous, and needs to be confronted by grass-roots efforts. All citizens in their local municipalities need to confront politicians and attend town hall meetings on the issue of vaccination. Not to forget other controversial issues too, like fluoridation, chlorination, and other approved contaminants in our drinking water.

Certainly the United States and other nations will follow through with similar programs since the WHO has issued its declaration. Canada, stand up for your rights! It’s on your front door that chicken-necked tyrants are roosting, and you need to sweep the porch before these fowl lay their contaminated eggs near other roosts.

Advertisements

Cell Phones Are Murder…

September 4, 2007

Cell Phones Give Lovely Headaches

Source: Daily Mail

Mobile phones can take as little as ten minutes to trigger changes in the brain associated with cancer, scientists claimed yesterday.

They found even low levels of radiation from handsets interfere with the way brain cells divide. Cell division encourages the growth of tumours.

Although the researchers did not come up with evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful, the findings suggest they could be.

Several major studies have also found no link between mobile use and brain tumours, nor a dramatic rise in cancer rates.

But campaigners insist the discovery undermines official advice that the devices are safe.

The guidance is based on the assumption that the phones emit too little radiation to heat the brain dangerously.

However, the new study by the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel suggests “nonthermal” radiation could pose a risk.

The Israeli scientists exposed human and rat cells in a laboratory to low-level radiation at 875 megahertz – a similar frequency to the one used in many mobile phones.

Although the radiation was far weaker than emissions from a typical handset, it began to switch on a chemical signal inside the cells within ten minutes, the researchers report in the Biochemical Journal.

The chemical signals they detected were involved in the division of cells.

The researchers say the reaction was not caused by heating and claim they have found a separate way in which mobile phones could damage health.

Dr Rony Seger, a co-author of the study, told the magazine New Scientist: “The significance lies in showing cells do react to cellphone radiation in a non-thermal way.”

Although changes in the chemical pathway seen by the Israeli scientists have been linked to several cancers, the researchers say there was no sign of a cancer-causing effect.

Dr Simon Arthur, a health expert at Dundee University, said the effect was ‘unlikely to cause cancer’.

Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, said: “If cell-phone radiation cannot induce biological effects then there will never be any health effects.

“On the other hand if we can show this radiation is able to induce biological effects then we have a different story.”

A major review of mobile phone safety is due to be published by the Health Protection Agency next month.

The agency’s last major report, in 2004, found no evidence mobiles were a serious health risk. It did, however, caution against excessive use, especially by the young.

Dr Michael Clark, a spokesman for the agency, said: “Because of findings like this that pop up from time to time, a precautionary approach is justified.”

Graham Philips, of campaign group Powerwatch, said: “Safety guidelines assume health effects from mobiles can only occur when significant heating of body tissue occurs.

“This study shows biological changes in response to low-level mobile phone radiation – something that could potentially have implications for health.

“Further research is required, however guidance based purely on thermal effects is clearly out of date.”

Submit to Social Websites